History and Nature of Science

Science is both a body of knowledge and a dynamic process of discovery. Understanding how scientific ideas develop, change, and are validated helps students appreciate science as a human endeavor shaped by curiosity, evidence, and collaboration across cultures and time.

Historical Development of Major Scientific Ideas

Scientific knowledge has evolved over centuries through observation, experimentation, and revision. Understanding these landmark developments helps students see that science is not a collection of fixed facts but an evolving understanding of natural phenomena.

📜 The Development of Cell Theory

1665 - Robert Hooke

Observed cork under microscope, coined the term "cells" for the small compartments he saw. Published findings in Micrographia.

1674 - Anton van Leeuwenhoek

First to observe living cells (bacteria, protozoa) using his improved microscopes. Called them "animalcules."

1838 - Matthias Schleiden

Concluded that all plants are made of cells—the first half of cell theory.

1839 - Theodor Schwann

Extended the cell concept to animals, establishing that all living things are composed of cells.

1855 - Rudolf Virchow

Added that all cells come from pre-existing cells ("Omnis cellula e cellula"), completing cell theory.

The Three Tenets of Cell Theory:

All living organisms are composed of one or more cells
The cell is the basic unit of structure and function in organisms
All cells arise from pre-existing cells

🌍 The Development of Plate Tectonics Theory

Year	Scientist	Contribution
1596	Abraham Ortelius	First to note that continents appear to fit together like puzzle pieces
1912	Alfred Wegener	Proposed continental drift theory; suggested continents were once joined as "Pangaea"
1929	Arthur Holmes	Proposed mantle convection as the mechanism driving continental movement
1960s	Harry Hess	Discovered seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges
1965	J. Tuzo Wilson	Introduced the concept of tectonic plates and transform faults

📌 Key Insight: Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was initially rejected because he couldn't explain how continents moved. It took decades of evidence (seafloor spreading, magnetic striping, earthquake patterns) before the theory was accepted. This illustrates how scientific ideas require both observation AND mechanism.

⚡ Newton's Laws of Motion

Isaac Newton (1643-1727) synthesized the work of Galileo, Kepler, and others to create a unified framework for understanding motion. Published in Principia Mathematica (1687).

First Law: Inertia

"An object at rest stays at rest, and an object in motion stays in motion at constant velocity, unless acted upon by an external force."

Building on: Galileo's experiments with rolling balls and inclined planes

Second Law: Force = Mass × Acceleration

"The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force and inversely proportional to its mass."

Formula: F = ma

Third Law: Action-Reaction

"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."

Examples: Rocket propulsion, walking, swimming

🍎 Law of Universal Gravitation

The Law

"Every particle of matter attracts every other particle with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them."

F = G(m₁m₂)/r²

Historical Significance

United terrestrial and celestial mechanics
Explained planetary orbits (building on Kepler)
Predicted existence of Neptune (1846)
Remained unchallenged until Einstein's General Relativity (1915)

📌 The "Apple Story": While likely apocryphal, the famous story of Newton and the falling apple illustrates how observation of everyday phenomena can lead to profound scientific insights when combined with mathematical reasoning.

Contributions from Diverse Cultures and Individuals

Science is a global human endeavor. Important discoveries and innovations have come from people of all backgrounds, genders, and cultures throughout history. Recognizing these contributions provides a more complete picture of how scientific knowledge develops.

🌍 Global Contributions to Science

Culture/Region	Time Period	Key Contributions
Ancient Mesopotamia	3500-500 BCE	Base-60 number system, astronomy, earliest known maps, medicine
Ancient Egypt	3000-300 BCE	Geometry, medicine, surgery, embalming chemistry, calendar
Ancient Greece	600 BCE-300 CE	Logical reasoning, atomic theory (Democritus), geometry (Euclid), medicine (Hippocrates)
Ancient China	1000 BCE-1500 CE	Compass, gunpowder, paper, printing, seismograph, astronomy
Ancient India	800 BCE-1200 CE	Zero and decimal system, algebra, astronomy, metallurgy (wootz steel)
Islamic Golden Age	800-1400 CE	Algebra, optics, chemistry, astronomy, medicine, preservation/translation of Greek texts
Mesoamerica	1500 BCE-1500 CE	Advanced astronomy, accurate calendars, mathematics, agricultural science
Africa	Ancient-Present	Iron smelting, mathematics, astronomy (Dogon), medicine, agriculture

👩‍🔬 Pioneering Women in Science

Marie Curie (1867-1934)

Contributions: Discovered polonium and radium; pioneered research on radioactivity

Recognition: First woman to win a Nobel Prize; only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different sciences (Physics 1903, Chemistry 1911)

Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958)

Contributions: X-ray crystallography of DNA; her Photo 51 was crucial to understanding DNA's double helix structure

Note: Her contributions were long underrecognized; Watson and Crick used her data without proper acknowledgment

Barbara McClintock (1902-1992)

Contributions: Discovered genetic transposition ("jumping genes") in maize

Recognition: Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1983), decades after her initial discovery was dismissed

Chien-Shiung Wu (1912-1997)

Contributions: Disproved the law of conservation of parity; "First Lady of Physics"

Note: Her experimental work proved a theory that earned colleagues the Nobel Prize, though she was excluded

🔬 Scientists Who Overcame Barriers

George Washington Carver (1864-1943)

Field: Agricultural chemistry

Contributions: Developed hundreds of products from peanuts, sweet potatoes, and soybeans; promoted crop rotation to restore soil

Mae C. Jemison (b. 1956)

Field: Medicine, astronautics

Contributions: First African American woman in space (1992); physician and engineer

Luis Walter Alvarez (1911-1988)

Field: Physics

Contributions: Nobel Prize in Physics (1968); developed the asteroid impact theory for dinosaur extinction (with son Walter)

Percy Julian (1899-1975)

Field: Chemistry

Contributions: Synthesized physostigmine, cortisone, and hormones; over 130 patents; pioneer in medicinal chemistry

The Scientific Process: Reasoning, Evidence, and Validation

Science is distinguished from other ways of knowing by its reliance on systematic observation, logical reasoning, empirical evidence, and community validation through peer review.

🔍 Components of the Scientific Process

🧠

Logical Reasoning

Inductive: Drawing general conclusions from specific observations

Deductive: Testing specific predictions derived from general principles

📊

Verifiable Evidence

Data that can be independently confirmed through observation or experimentation

Key feature: Others can repeat the process and get similar results

🔮

Prediction

Scientific theories make testable predictions about future observations

Power: Theories that make accurate predictions gain support

👥

Peer Review

Evaluation of research by qualified experts before publication

Purpose: Quality control, error detection, credibility

📝 The Peer Review Process

1. Submit
Researcher submits manuscript to journal

→

2. Editor Review
Initial screening for suitability

→

3. Peer Review
2-3 experts evaluate the work

→

4. Revision
Author addresses feedback

→

5. Publish
Accepted work is published

Types of Peer Review:

Single-blind: Reviewers know author identity; author doesn't know reviewers
Double-blind: Neither author nor reviewers know each other's identity
Open review: All identities are known; may be published alongside the paper

Principles of Scientific Ethics

Scientific ethics encompasses the moral principles that guide research conduct, data handling, publication, and the broader social responsibilities of scientists.

⚖️ Core Ethical Principles in Science

Principle	Definition	Examples of Violations
Honesty	Report data, results, and methods truthfully	Fabricating data, falsifying results
Objectivity	Minimize bias in experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation	Cherry-picking data, confirmation bias
Integrity	Keep promises and act with sincerity	Breaking confidentiality agreements
Carefulness	Avoid careless errors; maintain careful records	Sloppy record-keeping, preventable mistakes
Openness	Share data, methods, and results with others	Withholding data from legitimate requests
Credit	Give proper credit for contributions	Plagiarism, failing to acknowledge collaborators
Respect for Subjects	Protect human and animal research subjects	Inadequate informed consent, animal cruelty
Social Responsibility	Consider societal impact of research	Ignoring harmful applications of research

⚠️ Research Misconduct: The FFP Triad

Fabrication

Making up data or results and recording or reporting them as real

Falsification

Manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes; changing or omitting data

Plagiarism

Using another's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit

Science Compared to Other Ways of Knowing

Science is one of several methods humans use to understand the world. Understanding its unique characteristics—and how it differs from other approaches—helps students evaluate claims and sources of knowledge.

📚 Comparing Ways of Knowing

Way of Knowing	Basis for Knowledge	Testability	Openness to Revision
Science	Empirical evidence, experimentation, observation	✓ Claims must be testable and falsifiable	✓ Always subject to revision with new evidence
Religion/Faith	Sacred texts, revelation, tradition, spiritual experience	✗ Often addresses untestable claims	Varies by tradition
Philosophy	Logical reasoning, conceptual analysis, argumentation	Logic tested, not empirically	✓ Open to counter-arguments
Art/Aesthetics	Subjective experience, creativity, emotional response	✗ Not empirically testable	Evolves culturally
Traditional Knowledge	Cultural transmission, ancestral wisdom, practical experience	Often empirically grounded in observation	Slow to change; valued for stability
Pseudoscience	Claims scientific status without scientific method	✗ Avoids falsification	✗ Resistant to contrary evidence

✨ Distinguishing Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge

📏

Empirical

Based on observations and experiments that can be measured and recorded

🔄

Replicable

Results can be reproduced by independent researchers

❌

Falsifiable

Claims can, in principle, be proven wrong

📊

Quantitative

Often uses numerical data and statistical analysis

🎯

Objective

Seeks to minimize personal bias and subjectivity

📖

Cumulative

Builds on previous knowledge; "standing on the shoulders of giants"

The Dynamic Nature of Science: Models, Laws, and Theories

Scientific knowledge is not static—it evolves as new evidence emerges, new technologies enable better observations, and new frameworks provide better explanations.

🔬 Understanding Scientific Models, Laws, and Theories

Type	Definition	Purpose	Examples
Scientific Model	A simplified representation of a complex system or phenomenon	To visualize, explain, or make predictions about something difficult to observe directly	Atomic models, climate models, DNA double helix model
Scientific Law	A descriptive statement that summarizes observed patterns in nature, often expressed mathematically	To describe WHAT happens consistently under certain conditions	Law of gravity, laws of thermodynamics, Mendel's laws of inheritance
Scientific Theory	A well-substantiated explanation of natural phenomena, supported by extensive evidence	To explain WHY phenomena occur; provides mechanism	Theory of evolution, germ theory, atomic theory, theory of relativity

📌 Common Misconception: "It's just a theory" implies uncertainty. In science, "theory" means a well-tested explanation supported by extensive evidence—not a guess. Theories represent the most robust form of scientific knowledge. They are not promoted to "laws" because laws and theories serve different purposes.

🔄 Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge Over Time

Durability

Well-established scientific knowledge tends to persist because it has withstood extensive testing. Core concepts like atomic theory, germ theory, and evolution are extremely robust.

Example: Cell theory has remained valid since the 1800s, though details have been refined.

Tentativeness

All scientific knowledge is, in principle, open to revision if contradictory evidence emerges. Scientists hold knowledge provisionally.

Example: Newtonian physics was revised (not replaced) by Einstein's relativity for extreme conditions.

Replication

Scientific findings gain credibility when independently replicated by other researchers. Failed replications prompt re-examination.

Example: The "cold fusion" claims of 1989 were rejected when no one could replicate the results.

Reliance on Evidence

Claims require empirical support. The strength of scientific knowledge correlates with the quantity and quality of supporting evidence.

Example: Evolution is supported by fossils, DNA, biogeography, embryology, and direct observation.

💡 Paradigm Shifts in Science

Thomas Kuhn (1962) described how science sometimes undergoes revolutionary changes—"paradigm shifts"—where the fundamental framework of understanding is replaced.

Old Paradigm	→	New Paradigm
Geocentric universe (Earth-centered)	→	Heliocentric solar system (Sun-centered)
Spontaneous generation	→	Germ theory of disease
Newtonian mechanics (absolute space/time)	→	Einsteinian relativity
Static continents	→	Plate tectonics
Inheritance of acquired characteristics (Lamarckism)	→	Natural selection and genetics

Attitudes and Dispositions Underlying Scientific Thinking

Effective scientists—and scientifically literate citizens—share certain habits of mind that enable productive inquiry and critical evaluation of claims.

🧪 Scientific Habits of Mind

Curiosity

A genuine desire to understand how the world works; asking "why" and "how" questions; finding phenomena interesting rather than accepting them at face value.

Openness to New Ideas

Willingness to consider alternative explanations; avoiding premature closure; being receptive to evidence that challenges current beliefs.

Appropriate Skepticism

Questioning claims until sufficient evidence is provided; distinguishing between healthy doubt and cynical dismissal; demanding evidence proportional to claims.

Cooperation

Science is collaborative; sharing data, methods, and findings; building on others' work; subjecting ideas to community scrutiny.

Intellectual Humility

Recognizing the limits of one's own knowledge; being willing to say "I don't know"; acknowledging when evidence requires changing one's mind.

Persistence

Continuing investigation despite setbacks; viewing failed experiments as learning opportunities; maintaining effort over long periods.

Ethical Communication in Science

Scientists have responsibilities when producing, sharing, and representing their work through written, oral, and multimedia formats.

📢 Ethical Considerations in Science Communication

Principle	Description	Classroom Connection
Accuracy	Report findings accurately without exaggeration or distortion	Students report actual data, even unexpected results
Attribution	Credit sources and prior work appropriately	Students cite sources in research projects
Transparency	Disclose methods, limitations, and conflicts of interest	Students explain their procedures and acknowledge errors
Accessibility	Communicate clearly for intended audience	Students adapt explanations for different audiences
Responsibility	Consider how information might be used or misused	Discuss real-world implications of scientific discoveries
Visual Integrity	Graphs and images should represent data fairly	Teach proper scaling of axes, labeling, and image ethics

Science as a Human Endeavor, Process, and Career

Understanding science as something done by real people—with motivations, limitations, and career paths—makes science more accessible and relevant to students.

👤 Science as a Human Endeavor

Science is Done by People

Scientists come from all backgrounds, cultures, and walks of life
Personal experiences can influence what questions scientists ask
Collaboration and communication are essential
Scientists make mistakes; science is self-correcting over time

Science is a Process

Inquiry-based: driven by questions about the natural world
Iterative: hypotheses are tested, revised, retested
Collaborative: builds on the work of others
Self-correcting: errors are eventually identified and fixed

Science as a Career

Research scientists (universities, government, industry)
Applied scientists (engineering, medicine, technology)
Science educators and communicators
Policy advisors and science journalists
Technicians, lab managers, and support roles

Using Resources and Research Materials in Science

Students and teachers must be able to locate, evaluate, and use scientific information from various sources.

📖 Types of Information Sources in Science

Source Type	Description	Examples	Strengths
Primary Sources	Original research and data	Peer-reviewed journal articles, lab reports, raw data sets	Most authoritative; includes methodology details
Secondary Sources	Analysis or interpretation of primary sources	Review articles, textbooks, meta-analyses	Synthesize multiple studies; more accessible
Trade Books	Nonfiction books written for general audiences	Popular science books, biography of scientists	Engaging; good for motivation and context
Tables & Graphics	Visual representations of data	Data tables, graphs, charts, diagrams, infographics	Efficient communication; supports visual learners
Experiments	Hands-on investigations	Lab investigations, demonstrations, field studies	Direct experience; develops inquiry skills
Digital Resources	Online materials	Databases, simulations, videos, websites	Accessible; often interactive; can be updated

🔍 Evaluating Scientific Sources: The CRAAP Test

C - Currency

When was it published? Is it up-to-date for the topic?

R - Relevance

Does it relate to your question? Is it at the right level?

A - Authority

Who is the author? What are their credentials?

A - Accuracy

Is it supported by evidence? Can it be verified?

P - Purpose

Why was it created? Is there bias?

📚 Strategies for Helping Students Construct Meaning from Science Texts

Before Reading

Activate prior knowledge
Preview text features (headings, diagrams)
Set purpose for reading
Introduce key vocabulary

During Reading

Monitor comprehension ("Does this make sense?")
Make connections to prior learning
Annotate and take notes
Ask questions about confusing parts

After Reading

Summarize key ideas
Discuss with peers
Apply to new situations
Evaluate the source critically

Promoting Scientific Literacy

Scientific literacy enables citizens to understand scientific issues, evaluate claims, and make informed decisions. It goes beyond knowing facts to include understanding the nature and processes of science.

🎓 Components of Scientific Literacy

Content Knowledge

Understanding key scientific concepts, facts, and vocabulary across disciplines (life science, physical science, Earth science)

Process Skills

Ability to design investigations, collect data, analyze results, and draw evidence-based conclusions

Nature of Science

Understanding how science works: its methods, values, limitations, and relationship to society

Critical Evaluation

Ability to assess the credibility of scientific claims, identify bias, and distinguish science from pseudoscience

📊 Effective Strategies for Promoting Scientific Literacy

Strategy	Description	Example Activities
Inquiry-Based Learning	Students investigate questions through hands-on exploration	Design experiments, test hypotheses, analyze data
Analysis and Reflection	Deep thinking about evidence, methods, and conclusions	Lab notebooks, post-lab discussions, error analysis
Reading Like a Scientist	Critically engaging with scientific texts	Analyze primary research articles, evaluate news reports
Writing to Learn	Using writing to process and communicate understanding	Lab reports, explanatory essays, argument writing
Discourse and Argumentation	Discussing and debating scientific ideas	Socratic seminars, claim-evidence-reasoning discussions
Real-World Connections	Linking science to current events and students' lives	Current event analysis, community science projects

Differentiation Strategies

For English Language Learners (ELLs)

Visual timelines and graphic organizers: The visual history timelines help ELLs process chronological development of scientific ideas
Vocabulary development: Pre-teach key terms (hypothesis, theory, evidence, peer review) with definitions and examples
Cognates: Leverage Spanish cognates (hipótesis, teoría, evidencia, ética) for Spanish-speaking ELLs
Sentence frames: Provide structures for scientific discussion ("The evidence suggests..." "This theory explains...")
Bilingual glossaries: Create science vocabulary lists with translations
Visual representations: Use the tables, diagrams, and flowcharts extensively

For Struggling Learners

Chunked content: Break the material into smaller sections with frequent checks for understanding
Concrete examples: Connect abstract concepts (like "falsifiability") to everyday examples
Mnemonic devices: Use FFP for research misconduct, CRAAP for evaluating sources
Compare-contrast organizers: Help distinguish models vs. laws vs. theories
Repeated exposure: Revisit key concepts (evidence, peer review, tentativeness) across different contexts
Study guides: Provide simplified summaries of each major section

For Advanced Learners

Primary source analysis: Read excerpts from original scientific papers (Wegener, Darwin, Einstein)
Case studies: Analyze historical cases of scientific controversy (cold fusion, continental drift rejection)
Philosophy of science: Explore Kuhn's paradigm shifts, Popper's falsificationism, the demarcation problem
Ethics debates: Discuss complex cases (dual-use research, publication of dangerous findings)
Research projects: Investigate underrepresented scientists or scientific developments in non-Western cultures
Peer review simulation: Students review each other's lab reports using actual peer review criteria

For Students with Special Needs

Multiple modalities: The visual timelines, tables, and text explanations support different learning preferences
Reduced cognitive load: Focus on core concepts (evidence-based, tentative, replicable) before details
Predictable structure: Consistent formatting with clear headings helps students navigate
Extended time: Allow additional time for processing complex concepts like paradigm shifts
Assistive technology: Ensure compatibility with screen readers; provide text alternatives for visual elements
Hands-on activities: Connect abstract concepts to concrete experiences when possible

Assessment Strategies

Formative Assessment

Exit tickets: "Name one way science differs from other ways of knowing" or "Why is peer review important?"
Card sorts: Students categorize examples as models, laws, or theories
Think-pair-share: Discuss what makes a claim "scientific" vs. "non-scientific"
Timeline construction: Students create timelines for scientific developments (cell theory, plate tectonics)
Misconception probes: True/false questions addressing common misconceptions (e.g., "A theory becomes a law when proven")
Concept maps: Students diagram relationships between evidence, hypotheses, theories, and laws
Quick-writes: "Why was Wegener's idea rejected? What changed?"

Summative Assessment

Research paper: Investigate a scientist's contributions and the cultural/historical context of their work
Source evaluation: Given a set of sources, students apply CRAAP criteria and justify reliability ratings
Case study analysis: Analyze a historical scientific controversy using concepts from the lesson
Constructed response: Explain why "It's just a theory" reflects a misunderstanding of science
Scientific literacy assessment: Evaluate a news article about scientific research for accuracy and bias
Ethics scenario: Given a research ethics dilemma, students identify issues and propose solutions
Comparison essay: Compare and contrast science with another way of knowing

Key Takeaways

Historical Development

Major scientific ideas (cell theory, plate tectonics, laws of motion, universal gravitation) developed over time through cumulative contributions
Scientists from diverse cultures, backgrounds, and genders have contributed to scientific knowledge
Scientific ideas can be initially rejected and later accepted as evidence accumulates